Time to rethink the “Big Five” of African tourism?

I was watching a “real life” TV show about a wildlife veterinarian in South Africa. One of the local people spoke about the decline of the cheetahs and impalas in wildlife preserves. His comment was that it was unfortunate, but they weren’t part of the “Big Five” and therefore weren’t as relevant to tourism. He said that they were part of the “second 25.”

The “big five” are the lion, the African elephant, the Cape buffalo, the leopard and the black rhinoceros. They were called the big five because they were the hardest animals to kill in the golden age of hunting safaris. But still, to this day, that categorization is used for deciding which animals should be protected or prioritized for tourism.

I think that this embodies old thinking and doesn’t really reflect the desires of tourists today. Think about it, one of the “big five” that needs protected so that tourists can see it is the Cape buffalo; not the giraffe, zebra, hippo, cheetah, or gazelle. Look at that short list. Honestly, if you were going to South Africa to see wildlife, would you put the Cape buffalo as a priority over those others?

I have a group of students who come from well-off Korean families, and many of them have traveled extensively; two have even been to Africa. I gave my students a list of 14 African animals* and asked them to rank the animals in the order that they would most want to see them in the wild.

The results were surprising. Read for yourself (the "Big Five" are highlighted in blue.).

Table 1
Individual Student Rankings (All students)
total
overall ranking
firsts
seconds
giraffe
3
2
8
5
6
8
1
33
1
1
1
cheetah
6
3
2
4
8
1
11
35
2
1
1
leopard
9
4
5
2
2
2
14
38
3
0
3
gazelle
4
6
6
1
11
7
12
47
4
1
0
impala
1
1
7
3
13
13
9
47
5
2
0
lion
8
14
1
7
1
4
13
48
6
2
0
rhino
13
5
9
11
3
6
4
51
7
0
0
zebra
7
12
11
6
5
9
2
52
8
0
1
buffalo
5
8
13
10
10
3
10
59
9
0
0
ostrich
2
9
4
9
14
14
8
60
10
0
1
elephant
10
11
14
8
4
10
3
60
11
0
0
crocodile
15
7
10
14
7
5
7
65
12
0
0
gorilla
12
10
3
13
9
12
6
65
13
0
0
hippo
14
13
12
12
12
11
5
79
14
0
0

I had expected the lion to be first, but it came in sixth. I was also surprised that gazelle and impala came in higher than elephant and zebra. I was not surprised that the buffalo came in ninth, except that I actually expected it to be lower (there’s my bias. I would have put everything except the crocodile higher than the buffalo.).

This table shows the results when I remove the two students who have already been on safari in Africa.

Table 2 Individual Student Rankings (Minus 2 students)
 total 
overall ranking
firsts
seconds
leopard
4
5
2
2
2
15
1
0
3
cheetah
3
2
4
8
1
18
2
1
1
lion
14
1
7
1
4
27
3
2
0
giraffe
2
8
5
6
8
29
4
0
1
gazelle
6
6
1
11
7
31
5
1
0
rhino
5
9
11
3
6
34
6
0
0
impala
1
7
3
13
13
37
7
1
0
zebra
12
11
6
5
9
43
8
0
0
crocodile
7
10
14
7
5
43
9
0
0
buffalo
8
13
10
10
3
44
10
0
0
elephant
11
14
8
4
10
47
11
0
0
gorilla
10
3
13
9
12
47
12
0
0
ostrich
9
4
9
14
14
50
13
0
0
hippo
13
12
12
12
11
60
14
0
0

Interesting that cats are the top three.

Look at what the Big Five would be by ordinal (firsts and seconds). Again, the differences are huge when you factor out people who have already been to Africa and seen some of these animals.

All students
overall ranking
firsts
seconds
impala
1
2
0
lion
2
2
0
giraffe
3
1
1
cheetah
4
1
1
gazelle
5
1
0
Only students who haven't been to Africa
overall ranking
firsts
seconds
lion
1
2
0
cheetah
2
1
1
gazelle
3
1
0
impala
4
1
0
leopard
5
0
3

If these results are typical, then the idea of the "Big Five" is doing African tourism a big disservice, as both of these rankings incorporate only a minority of the Big Five that African tourism promotes.

Obviously this is not a scientific or statistically accurate representation, with sampling sizes of 7 and 5, and the fact that I have no professional training on conducting surveys. For one thing, for students who didn’t know what they were, I described gazelle as big deer with horns and impalas as little deer with horns that hop as they run. I know that there are many breeds of impala, bok and gazelle, but I decided that if they wanted to see one kind, then they equally would want to see all kinds (like I said, not scientific).

*Fourteen because that’s how many I thought of. If there are major omissions, oops.
Updated: Hyenas! Oops. Wildebeest! Damn…

 Further Reading 

Wikipedia’s overview of the big five.

An article about safaris that offers a more realistic approach to expectations about seeing African animals.

— SGP

Vicarious Vistas - by Stephen G Parks

Opinion
articles

In My African Dream

I Was Born in the Sign of Water

The Best Beaches, and a Few Cities, too

From the Information Age to the Manipulation Age in Three
Easy Steps

Time to rethink the “Big Five” of African tourism?

What follows Capitalism?

Zimbabwe and Namibia

Fortune Cookies Rule My Life

When Good TV Makes You Want to Read

My Introduction to African Music

The Lost Galactica X-Files

Live Music in other Countries

NRN – a light-hearted RFC for “non-binding closure”

Thoughts on Shel Silverstein

30 Years Ago in a Movie Theatre Far, Far Away…

Some Books Are More Important Than Others

Thoughts on Alfred Beach

Why isn't there an Adobe OS?

Index


sections

Travel
Opinion
Notes From Korea
Notes From Namibia
What a Week!
About  Privacy  Contact


All content, written, photographic and otherwise is (c) 2007-2008 by Stephen Gregory Parks. All rights reserved. You may not use, duplicate, modify, embed or borrow any content, incorporate it into any site, design or material of any kind, nor use it in any way or form, without express written permission of the copyright holder.